CACHE

CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTATIONAL HIT-FINDING EXPERIMENTS

DONATE

  • About
    • WHAT IS CACHE
    • Conferences
  • CACHE News
  • CHALLENGES
    • Challenge #1
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
      • Final results
    • Challenge #2
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
      • Final Results
    • Challenge #3
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
      • Final Results
    • Challenge #4
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
    • Challenge #5
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
    • Challenge #6
      • Announcement
    • FAQ
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • CONTACT

Challenge #2

Hit Identification
Method type (check all that applies)
De novo design
High-throughput docking
Physics-based
Hybrid of the above
Physics-based (molecular dynamics simulations), de novo design (3D pharmacophore-based virtual screening) and high-throughput docking
Description of your approach (min 200 and max 800 words)

The project will begin with a structure-based analysis of the RNA binding cavity of NSP13, based on the crystal structure 7KRN, using molecular dynamics simulations together with in-house program PyRod [1,2] to sample interaction points in the binding pocket. Briefly, PyRod traces water molecules in protein binding cavities and generates dynamic maps describing the interaction patterns of the water molecules with respect to the protein. This identifies water molecules whose displacement with appropriate ligand moieties should result in a more favorable free energy upon ligand binding, thus increasing the chance of identifying high-affinity ligands. The results from these analyses will be used to generate 3D pharmacophore features for 3D pharmacophore-based virtual screening of the Enamine Real database [3]. As a second approach, we will derive structure-based 3D pharmacophores of the co-crystallized ligands VXG, VXD and VWM of the 5RMM, 5RML and 5RLZ crystal structures respectively. Those will be aligned to the 3D pharmacophores generated by PyRod to optimize our screening pharmacophore. The initial list of hit compounds will firstly be filtered via molecular docking into the binding cavity and subsequent scoring of the docking poses against the initial screening pharmacophore [4-11]. The compounds will then further be filtered by the ACS substructure filter to remove pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS), and by chemical diversity via Tanimoto coefficients based on Morgan fingerprints of the hits. The final filtering step will comprise visual inspection to ensure shape complementarity of hits to the binding cavity.

What makes your approach stand out from the community? (<100 words)

The combination of our two structure-based approaches, being the application of the in-house program Pyrod[1,2] for the creation of 3D pharmacophores based upon molecular dynamics simulations of water molecules in the protein binding cavities in addition to the use of 3D pharmacophores of the co-crystallized ligands would allow us to generate 3D pharmacophores with certain features, that would increase the chance of obtaining high-affinity ligands.

Method Name
Dynamic 3D Pharmacophores
Commercial software packages used

InteLigand - LigandScout

CCG - MOE

Schrodinger - Desmond

CCDC - GOLD

OpenEye - Szybki

Free software packages used

PyRod

Relevant publications of previous uses by your group of this software/method
  1. Schaller D, Pach S, Wolber G. PyRod: Tracing Water Molecules in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Jun 24;59(6):2818-29. (10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00281)
  2. Pach S, Sarter TM, Yousef R, Schaller D, Bergemann S, Arkona C, et al. Catching a Moving Target: Comparative Modeling of Flaviviral NS2B-NS3 Reveals Small Molecule Zika Protease Inhibitors. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020 Apr 9;11(4):514-20. (10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00629)
  3. Schaller D, Šribar D, Noonan T, Deng L, Nguyen TN, Pach S, et al. Next generation 3D pharmacophore modeling. WIREs Comput Mol Sci. 2020 Jul;10(4) (10.1002/wcms.1468)
  4. Machalz D, Li H, Du W, Sharma S, Liu S, Bureik M, et al. Discovery of a novel potent cytochrome P450 CYP4Z1 inhibitor. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2021 Apr;215:113255. (10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113255)
  5. Pach S, Sarter TM, Yousef R, Schaller D, Bergemann S, Arkona C, et al. Catching a Moving Target: Comparative Modeling of Flaviviral NS2B-NS3 Reveals Small Molecule Zika Protease Inhibitors. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020 Apr 9;11(4):514-20. (10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00629)
  6. Šribar D, Grabowski M, Murgueitio MS, Bermudez M, Weindl G, Wolber G. Identification and characterization of a novel chemotype for human TLR8 inhibitors. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2019 Oct;179:744-52. (10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.06.084)
  7. Schulz R, Atef A, Becker D, Gottschalk F, Tauber C, Wagner S, et al. Phenylthiomethyl Ketone-Based Fragments Show Selective and Irreversible Inhibition of Enteroviral 3C Proteases. J Med Chem. 2018 Feb 8;61(3):1218-30. (10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01440)
  8. Murgueitio M, Ebner S, Hörtnagl P, Rakers C, Bruckner R, Henneke P, et al. Enhanced immunostimulatory activity of in silico discovered agonists of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. 2017 Nov;1861(11):2680-9. (10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.07.011)
  9. Rakers C, Schumacher F, Meinl W, Glatt H, Kleuser B, Wolber G. In Silico Prediction of Human Sulfotransferase 1E1 Activity Guided by Pharmacophores from Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2016 Jan;291(1):58-71. (10.1074/jbc.M115.685610)
  10. Wolber G, Dornhofer AA, Langer T. Efficient overlay of small organic molecules using 3D pharmacophores. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2007 Feb 7;20(12):773-88. (10.1007/s10822-006-9078-7)
  11.  Wolber G, Langer T. LigandScout:  3-D Pharmacophores Derived from Protein-Bound Ligands and Their Use as Virtual Screening Filters. J Chem Inf Model. 2005 Jan 1;45(1):160-9. (10.1021/ci049885e)
Hit Optimization Methods
Method type (check all that applies)
De novo design
Machine learning
Physics-based
Description of your approach (min 200 and max 800 words)

3D pharmacophore models of each of the most active hits will be generated. These pharmacophores might show additional interaction points not included in the starting pharmacophore model. The binding affinity data will be related to the static 3D pharmacophores of the hit compounds to generate initial structure-activity relationship models [1]. These will be further investigated using our in-house dynamic pharmacophore (dynophore) method [2-6], based on molecular dynamics simulations of the ligands within the NSP13 binding cavity.  The fully-automated dynophore method analyzes the interaction pattern between ligand and protein over the course of MD simulations, generating a visual representation of the types of 3D pharmacophore feature types that occur over the course of the simulation, along with their respective statistical occurrences. Dynophores from most active compounds will be geometrically merged and chemical features weights will be trained using active compounds using different machine learning techniques. Furthermore, water-mediated interactions between ligand and protein will be analyzed to provide further insight into the interactions contributing to binding affinity. These analyses will determine the contribution of different interactions to ligand binding affinities, suggesting which chemical and structural properties to prioritize in the derivative compounds. Derivatives will be identified via two different methods. One will be to perform a shape-based analog search using the ROCS software from OpenEye [7]. The other will be the combinatorial in-silico generation of active ligand-derivatives using the Reactor software from ChemAxon (https://chemaxon.com/products/reactor) with subsequent docking and dynophore-based scoring.

What makes your approach stand out from the community? (<100 words)

The Application of our in-house dynamic pharmacophore (dynophore) method [2-6] will allow us to analyze the interaction patterns between the ligand and the corresponding protein over the course of the molecular dynamics simulations and the obtained data from the analysis would be compared with the experimental data. Additionally different machine learning methods would be applied to train the geometrically merged dynophores and chemical features of the active compounds, thus allowing us to purpose chemical and structural properties in the optimization of the compounds.

Method Name
Dynamic interaction pattern - based SAR determination followed by shape - based chemical similarity search and in-silico combinatorial derivative generation.
Commercial software packages used

InteLigand - LigandScout

CCG - MOE

Schrodinger - Desmond

OpenEye - ROCS

ChemAxon - Reactor

Free software packages used

Dynophore

Relevant publications of previous uses by your group of this software/method
  1. Pach S, Sarter TM, Yousef R, Schaller D, Bergemann S, Arkona C, et al. Catching a Moving Target: Comparative Modeling of Flaviviral NS2B-NS3 Reveals Small Molecule Zika Protease Inhibitors. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020 Apr 9;11(4):514-20. (10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00629)
  2. Bock A, Bermudez M, Krebs F, Matera C, Chirinda B, Sydow D, et al. Ligand Binding Ensembles Determine Graded Agonist Efficacies at a G Protein-coupled Receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2016 Jul;291(31):16375-89.(10.1074/jbc.M116.735431)
  3. Machalz D, Pach S, Bermudez M, Bureik M, Wolber G. Structural insights into understudied human cytochrome P450 enzymes. Drug Discovery Today. 2021 Oct;26(10):2456-64. (10.1016/j.drudis.2021.06.006)
  4. Machalz D, Li H, Du W, Sharma S, Liu S, Bureik M, et al. Discovery of a novel potent cytochrome P450 CYP4Z1 inhibitor. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2021 Apr;215:113255. (10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113255)
  5. Denzinger K, Nguyen TN, Noonan T, Wolber G, Bermudez M. Biased Ligands Differentially Shape the Conformation of the Extracellular Loop Region in 5-HT2B Receptors. IJMS. 2020 Dec 20;21(24):9728. (10.3390/ijms21249728)                            
  6. Meşeli T, Doğan ŞD, Gündüz MG, Kökbudak Z, Skaro Bogojevic S, Noonan T, et al. Design, synthesis, antibacterial activity evaluation and molecular modeling studies of new sulfonamides containing a sulfathiazole moiety. New J Chem. 2021;45(18):8166-77. (10.1039/d1nj00150g)
  7. Šribar D, Grabowski M, Murgueitio MS, Bermudez M, Weindl G, Wolber G. Identification and characterization of a novel chemotype for human TLR8 inhibitors. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2019 Oct;179:744-52. (10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.06.084)

Cache

All rights reserved
v5.47.19.49

Footer first

  • Login
  • Applicant Login
  • Terms of Participation
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQ
  • Docs
This website is licensed under CC-BY 4.0

Toronto website development by Rebel Trail