CACHE

CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTATIONAL HIT-FINDING EXPERIMENTS

DONATE

  • About
    • WHAT IS CACHE
    • Conferences
  • CACHE News
  • CHALLENGES
    • Challenge #1
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
      • Final results
    • Challenge #2
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
      • Final Results
    • Challenge #3
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
      • Final Results
    • Challenge #4
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
    • Challenge #5
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
    • Challenge #6
      • Announcement
    • FAQ
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • CONTACT

Challenge #5

Hit Identification
Method type (check all that applies)
De novo design
Free energy perturbation
High-throughput docking
Description of your approach (min 200 and max 800 words)

In approaching the challenge of predicting novel MCHR1 antagonists, given the absence of available crystal structures, a multi-faceted strategy is essential. The first hurdle is to establish an accurate model of MCHR1, which can be achieved through either homology modeling or utilizing the structure from AlphaFold. To ensure robustness, both methods would be employed, and the resulting structures compared to gauge their accuracy relative to other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

Following model selection, the next step involves employing the induced fit docking protocol in Schrödinger Maestro. This would entail docking ten known antagonists to the orthosteric binding site of MCHR1 and choosing the optimal pose for each ligand. Subsequently, a high-throughput virtual screen for each of the ten receptor conformations would be conducted, drawing compounds from the Zinc22 database. Given the tendency for antagonists to exceed 500 Da, a criterion for ligand selection would be set, taking into account that compounds over 550 Da would be filtered out by Zinc22. Hence, ligands 550 Da and below will be downloaded for further analysis.

Upon completion of the high-throughput screen, ligands with a Glide score of -8 or more positive would be excluded. The remaining ligands would undergo a subsequent evaluation using Glide SP in Schrödinger Maestro, incorporating the known MCHR1 antagonists as internal controls across all ten receptor conformations. Cutoff scores for Glide SP would be determined based on the highest-ranking score from the control ligands, discarding all ligands that fall below this threshold.

The final step involves conducting a round of Glide XP with expanded sampling. This would be carried out once again, utilizing all control ligands. Ligands failing to outperform the best-ranking control ligand would be discarded. The ultimate selection of ligands would involve identifying those that consistently overlap across all ten screenings, ensuring a comprehensive and robust set of potential MCHR1 antagonists.

 

 

 

 

What makes your approach stand out from the community? (<100 words)

This approach stands out through its meticulous selection process, where ligands are chosen based on their consistent performance across all ten screenings. This stringent criterion ensures that only the most promising compounds, exhibiting superior binding affinities in a variety of receptor conformations, are selected. By emphasizing overlapping ligand selection, the approach not only prioritizes individual ligand performance but also underscores the importance of robustness and reliability in identifying potential MCHR1 antagonists. This systematic and comprehensive evaluation sets the approach apart, demonstrating a commitment to selecting compounds that consistently outperform others across diverse scenarios, thereby enhancing confidence in the final ligand choices.

Method Name
Integrated Orthosteric Docking and Multiconformational Screening: A Comprehensive Approach for Predicting Novel MCHR1 Antagonists
Commercial software packages used

Schrodinger Maestro

Free software packages used

Zinc 22
Swiss Model
AlphaFold

Relevant publications of previous uses by your group of this software/method

1. Pharmacological evaluation of enantiomerically separated positive allosteric modulators of cannabinoid 1 receptor, GAT591 and GAT593

2. Assessment of select synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist bias and selectivity between the type 1 and type 2 cannabinoid receptor

3. Serotonin 2A Receptor (5-HT2AR) Activation by 25H-NBOMe Positional Isomers: In Vitro Functional Evaluation and Molecular Docking

4. Application of Fluorine- and Nitrogen-Walk Approaches: Defining the Structural and Functional Diversity of 2-Phenylindole Class of Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Positive Allosteric Modulators

 

Cache

All rights reserved
v5.47.19.49

Footer first

  • Login
  • Applicant Login
  • Terms of Participation
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQ
  • Docs
This website is licensed under CC-BY 4.0

Toronto website development by Rebel Trail