CACHE

CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTATIONAL HIT-FINDING EXPERIMENTS

DONATE

  • About
    • WHAT IS CACHE
    • Conferences
  • CACHE News
  • CHALLENGES
    • Challenge #1
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
      • Final results
    • Challenge #2
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
      • Final Results
    • Challenge #3
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
      • Final Results
    • Challenge #4
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
      • Preliminary results
    • Challenge #5
      • Announcement
      • Computation methods
    • Challenge #6
      • Announcement
    • FAQ
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • CONTACT

Challenge #5

Hit Identification
Method type (check all that applies)
Machine learning
Physics-based
Description of your approach (min 200 and max 800 words)

Our approach is a ligand-based method where the most active compound will be used as a reference to find potential MCH antagonists. Our method partitions the reference structure in multiple fragments and compares each of the fragments against a library of the building blocks used to create the EnamineREAL library. The selection of the best building blocks is performed using the hydrophobic profile in 3D derived from QM-based descriptors. In order to align and compare the molecules, a low energy/bioactive conformer has to be generated for the reference fragments. This conformer is then superposed to multiple conformers of each building block to take into account molecular flexibility. The alignment of both structures is carried out by maximizing the similarity of their hydrophobic fields, which will be utilized for comparing the two structures.  The hydrophobic field is derived from the fractional hydrophobic contributions within the quantum mechanical version of the Miertus−Scrocco−Tomasi (MST) continuum model, which provides a structure-agnostic descriptor that increases the diversity of the selected compounds. From the comparison of each reference fragment against the building block library, a list of prioritized building blocks is generated. Then, these building blocks are combined using the associated chemical reactions provided by Enamine to enumerate a library of candidate compounds; generating only structures that can be purchased from the library. If enough information of the binding mode of the known active compounds is gathered, more than one reference structure might be selected for screening to take into account the different binding modes.

Optionally a second step to refine the selected compounds might be performed. If most structures share the binding mode, 3D QSAR methods could be used to generate a model to predict the activity of the enumerated compounds. In order to do that a 3D overlay of the provided structures will be generated and the same hydrophobic profile will be used to generate a 3D QSAR model. Then, this model will be used to predict the activity of the enumerated compounds and refine the selection. Alternatively, if the 3D QSAR model quality is not good, selected compounds can also be docked to the Alphafold structure to refine the final compound selection. This second step will be more important in the Hit Optimization stage.

What makes your approach stand out from the community? (<100 words)

Our method is the only one that can explore huge chemical spaces like EnamineREAL using QM-based 3D descriptors. This approach increases chemical diversity due to the usage of the molecular fields of interaction to perform the 3D alignment and comparison of compounds. Moreover, the approach also has the advantage of generating synthesizable molecules from the EnamineREAL library, enabling the exploration of a huge chemical space but also ensuring a reduced time and cost to acquire the compounds.

Method Name
exaScreen
Commercial software packages used

exaScreen (https://pharmacelera.com/exascreen/)

pharmQSAR (https://pharmacelera.com/pharmqsar/)

Free software packages used

RDKit (https://www.rdkit.org/)

rDock (https://rdock.github.io/)

Relevant publications of previous uses by your group of this software/method
  • J. Vazquez, T. Ginex, A. Herrero, C. Morisseau, B.D. Hammock and F. J. Luque, “Screening and Biological Evaluation of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibitors: Assessing the Role of Hydrophobicity in the Pharmacophore-Guided Search of Novel Hits”; Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (JCIM), 2023, 63, 10, 3209–3225, doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00301
  • J. Vázquez, A. Deplano, A. Herrero, T. Ginex, E. Gibert, O. Rabal, J. Oyarzabal, E. Herrero, F. J. Luque, “Development and Validation of Molecular Overlays Derived From 3D Hydrophobic Similarity with PharmScreen", Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (JCIM), 58(8), July 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00216
  • J. Vazquez, A. Deplano, A. Herrero, E. Gibert, E. Herrero, F. J. Luque, “Assessing the Performance of Mixed Strategies to Combine Lipophilic Molecular Similarity and Docking in Virtual Screening”, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (JCIM) 60(9) 4231–4245, May 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01191

Cache

All rights reserved
v5.47.19.49

Footer first

  • Login
  • Applicant Login
  • Terms of Participation
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQ
  • Docs
This website is licensed under CC-BY 4.0

Toronto website development by Rebel Trail